Join me as I explore the intersection of the First Amendment with immigration law. Do lawful legal aliens enjoy full First Amendment rights to engage in extreme advocacy and protests? Or does the federal government enjoy an expanded power to deport troublemaking aliens? We dive into the caselaw to get the right answer and examine how other countries handle the same issue.
Table of Contents:
00:00 - Intro
01:24 - How Does Free Speech Apply
02:43 - Historical Precedent
03:39 - Post World War 1
05:13 - The McCarthyism Red Scare
07:16 - Judicial Deference for National Security
08:25 - Affiliation with Subversive Groups
10:08 - Sept. 11th 2001 Attacks
10:59 - LA 8: Protected for Citizens =/= Aliens
13:06 - Post 9/11 Aggressive Prosecution
14:46 - Due Process Applies to Non-Citizens
15:53 - Withholding Evidence for Natl. Security
17:10 - Providing Support for Terrorist Organization
17:58 - Khalil Allegations and Executive Power
19:04 - Precedent Does Not Favor Khalil
20:17 - How To Behave as A Guest
21:44 - Khalil Has Few Arguments Against Removal
23:13 - Similar Scenarios in Other Countries
31:48 - National Security Overrules 1A Concerns
32:34 - Why the Sudden Support for Foreign Nationals
32:57 - Conclusions and Thoughts