MENU

Fun & Interesting

'Dead Man's Shoes' Reaction: You Must See This!

Thea and the Movies 11,442 lượt xem 1 year ago
Video Not Working? Fix It Now

In an "Emotional Review of Dead Man's Shoes," I share my genuine feelings and reaction to one of the most powerful and thought-provoking films I've ever seen.

Hi all and welcome to Thea and The Movies where I react to the best of Film and TV.

If you would like to support my channel, you can join the community at the below link:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLRQgBGa-mtnGPnVU1SF1kA/join

When you become a member of the channel community, you will get access to exclusive benefits such as:

• Early Access to my Reactions at least 24 hours before they appear on YouTube

• Full length reactions • Bloopers and Outtakes

• Ability to select the movies or TV Series that I react too and much more, then please visit: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/theaandthemovie

NB: Please note that this movie contains strong themes of violence and those sensitive to such issues should take that into account that before viewing this reaction.

In this Video, I react to the Movie 'Dead Man’s Shoes' (2004) which is about a disaffected soldier returns to his hometown to get even with the thugs who brutalized his mentally-challenged brother years ago.
This movie scores a 7.6/10 on IMDB and I personally would rate it a 8/10 given it's originality.

This movie was written by Paddy Considine, Shane Meadows and Paul Fraser.

This movie was directed by Shane Meadows.

This movie stars Paddy Considine, Gary Stretch and Toby Kebbell amongst others. Please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0419677/ for the full cast list.

This movie was produced by Warp Films, EMMI and Film Four.

The Copyright to the full original content is held by Film Four, EM-Media and Warp Films. The copyright to this video is held by Thea and the Movies.

Legal and Copyright Disclaimers: Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement.

In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author.

The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part.

Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement.

In addition, as per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video as a reaction video for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive.

For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be requested:

- Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights
- Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above
- Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video
- Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video
- Evidence that the copyright infringement claimant has considered the requirements of Fair Dealing and Fair Usage Exemptions to copyright and the rationale why this video does not Note:meet those requirements.

All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders, e.g. distributors, will be reported to the police as attempted fraud!

Comment