A conversation between Ramesh Balsekar and Peter, exploring the concept of enlightenment. They discuss the nature of happiness, the role of the ego, and the relationship between the self and the source. Ramesh asserts that enlightenment is not about seeking happiness or ending suffering, but about understanding one's true nature and accepting that all actions are ultimately governed by a cosmic law. He challenges the traditional view of the self as being within us, suggesting instead that the self is the source, and the ego is the instrument through which the source functions. This leads to an ongoing discussion about the interplay between the ego, the self, and the source, with Ramesh ultimately advocating for a detached yet compassionate view of life, where one acknowledges their role as a three-dimensional object within a larger, divine orchestration
The Nature of Happiness vs. Pleasure
In the sources, happiness is described as a state of being that is not dependent on external circumstances or fleeting pleasures. While pleasure is a temporary experience, happiness is presented as something more enduring and profound.
Here are some key distinctions made between happiness and pleasure:
Happiness is not found in the "flow of life": True happiness is not contingent on what happens in life, be it positive or negative events. It transcends the ups and downs, the pleasures and pains, that inevitably arise in daily existence.
Happiness is an attitude, not a reaction: Rather than being a fleeting response to external stimuli, happiness is described as an unwavering attitude towards life itself. This attitude is not about suppressing natural reactions but cultivating a different perspective on them.
Shifting from "me versus the other" to "me and the other": A key element of this attitude is a move away from viewing relationships through a lens of separation and competition ("me versus the other"). Instead, happiness arises from recognising the interconnectedness of all beings and approaching relationships with understanding and compassion ("me and the other").
Accepting the nature of reality: This shift in perspective is rooted in a deep acceptance that everything happens according to a cosmic order, even if that order remains a mystery. This acceptance allows for a sense of peace and frees one from the suffering of resisting what is.
Gratitude as a pathway: Gratitude is presented as a powerful force that can lead to happiness. When one recognises the interconnected nature of life and the grace that comes with simply existing, a deep sense of appreciation arises naturally.
The sources highlight that happiness is not a destination, but a way of being. It's about cultivating an inner state that is not easily swayed by the ever-changing landscape of life. This involves understanding the illusory nature of the ego and the limitations of the "body-mind organism," while recognizing our connection to something larger than ourselves. While the journey to this understanding is not always easy, the sources suggest that it is a worthwhile pursuit.