MENU

Fun & Interesting

The Realized Relevance of John Vervaeke

Scientific Genius 655 3 years ago
Video Not Working? Fix It Now

REFERENCES: John's Ted Talk (2018): https://youtu.be/czddkPxz4K4?t=596 Cognitive Science: https://youtu.be/pqsUDNkBt-Q?t=847 Synoptic Integration: https://youtu.be/pqsUDNkBt-Q?t=1338 The power of metaphor: https://youtu.be/pqsUDNkBt-Q?t=1424 Constructs: https://youtu.be/pqsUDNkBt-Q?t=1910 Problem Space demonstration: https://youtu.be/pqsUDNkBt-Q?t=3313 Relevance Realization demonstration (Episode 27): https://youtu.be/9j5O-tnaFzE?t=577 The constructs in my demonstration come from the following sources: Fludd: Mosaicall Philosophy p.79 https://archive.org/details/mosaicallphiloso00flud Wolfram: A New Kind of Science p.489 https://www.wolframscience.com/nks/p489--time-and-causal-networks/ Fuller: Fig 1012.14B http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s10/figs/f1214b.html Whitehead: "A Key to Whitehead’s Process and Reality" by Donald Sherburne (1966) p.10 You can find my published article about the Kepler-Fludd polemic on my Academia page: https://queensu.academia.edu/DanteDiotallevi *Although I attribute the translations of the Kepler-Fludd letters (from Latin to German) to Pauli, he acknowledges the help of Marie-Louise von Franz in providing these in the preface to his essay.

Comment