该部分内容以山东单位 “不结婚就开除员工” 和山西平遥古城 “强行撬锁开灯” 两个热点事件为切入点，分析它们在出发点与行为上的矛盾，指出二者存在公权侵犯私权的本质问题且均违法。接着，作者以自家堂妹受照顾却未婚，自己在尊重其私权基础上与之进行条件交换的事例，对比强调自己与山东单位强制行为的差异。最后得出结论，强调明确公权私权边界的重要性，提出类似情况的正确处理方式，并表明讨论热点事件对维护权益和理解他人立场的积极意义。
This part takes two hot events, "Employees will be fired if they don't get married" in a Shandong unit and "Forcibly breaking the lock and turning on the lights" in the ancient city of Pingyao, Shanxi Province, as the entry points, analyzes the contradictions in their starting points and behaviors, and points out that both have the essential problem of public power infringing on private rights and are illegal. Then, the author takes the example of his own cousin who was taken care of but unmarried and made a conditional exchange with her on the basis of respecting her private rights, comparing and emphasizing the difference between himself and the coercive behavior of the Shandong unit. Finally, it draws the conclusion, emphasizes the importance of clarifying the boundary between public rights and private rights, proposes the correct way to handle similar situations, and shows the positive significance of discussing hot events for safeguarding rights and understanding the positions of others.